As India and China compete, smaller States are cashing in | Daily News

As India and China compete, smaller States are cashing in

President Gotabaya Rajapaksa with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi
President Gotabaya Rajapaksa with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi

The Maldives and Sri Lanka show how they can bargain with bigger powers to their advantage.

This month, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi visited Sri Lanka and the Maldives. On the surface, the trip was part of an effort by China to make further inroads into South Asia and cement its presence in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR). But it also reflects a new regional trend in which smaller South Asian states seek to maximize their political and economic gains as competition between regional powers India and China intensifies.

Wang signed multiple agreements with the Maldives during his visit, including new visa arrangements, aid grants, and infrastructure management pacts. These deals came despite the island state’s so-called “India First” policy to reprioritize its ties with New Delhi and limit its dependence on Beijing. Wang’s visit was aptly timed: It came on the heels of a less successful year for China in the Maldives and coincided with former Maldivian President Abdulla Yameen’s “India Out” campaign, which politicizes New Delhi’s role as a net security provider.

Similarly, during Wang’s time in Colombo, Sri Lankan officials took the opportunity to request debt restructuring and new concessional trade schemes. The visit also came as Sri Lanka begins to play its India card against China.

Last year, Sri Lanka banned a consignment of organic fertilizer imports from China, and Beijing’s angry response led Colombo to seek emergency organic fertilizer supplies from New Delhi, which it provided. Sri Lanka also cancelled a few Chinese energy projects in the Jaffna Peninsula and offered India a deal to modernize an oil terminal in the Eastern City of Trincomalee.

Greater regional influence

These developments are part of a significant phenomenon among South Asia’s smaller States: playing China and India against each other as they vie for greater regional influence. Even Bangladesh and Nepal, traditionally closer to India, have begun to actively balance between the two Asian giants. Signs indicate that this trend will escalate in the coming years, for two reasons.

First, China has deep-rooted strategic interests in South Asia, which it approaches as a relatively untapped market to supplement its growth through trade and investments. Beijing also uses its presence in the region to curb New Delhi, the only Asian power that could challenge its status and military might. China’s investments in South Asia grant it access to the Indian Ocean Region to enable it to encircle India. Beijing is increasingly keen on expanding its influence there to deter chokepoint blockades and potential buildups of adversary troops, especially as India grows closer to the other members of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue: Australia, Japan, and the United States.

On the other hand, India is committed to maintaining the status quo in South Asia, and it has gained experience with limiting China’s influence in the region. New Delhi was initially unprepared to counter Beijing’s unprecedented strategic expansion in the region, but that is no longer the case.

India saw Chinese infrastructure projects as hindering its influence by debt-trapping South Asian states, apprehensions exacerbated by Sri Lanka’s 99-year lease of its Hambantota Port to China in 2017. This episode led India to embrace a new geo-economic approach to the region, seeking to increase connectivity and infrastructure in vital strategic locations.

The deadly clash and subsequent standoff with China in eastern Ladakh in 2020—the first time shots were fired along the border for decades—provided another lesson for India. It intensified the trust deficit between the two countries, amplifying their rivalry and their battle for status in the region. Taking a more proactive approach, India has since begun to offer more economic incentives, space for private players, and new mega-infrastructure projects in its neighbourhood. It has also undertaken tough bargains against Chinese investments in the region.

India’s policies in Sri Lanka and the Maldives last year are a case in point for this proactive diplomacy. In Sri Lanka, India has consistently bargained to maintain its presence in a major Colombo Port project and to cancel the Chinese energy projects in the Jaffna Peninsula. It has also continued offering currency swaps to Sri Lanka after withholding these requests for years. Colombo just received new currency swaps and US$ 1.5 billion in financial assistance from New Delhi. In the Maldives, India was working on more 45 major development projects by mid-2021.

Big powers

As the confrontation between India and China becomes part of the status quo in South Asia, smaller States have begun to exert their own leverage. India’s structural dominance in the region long fostered a sense of insecurity among these smaller States. The rise of China offered a new alternative to India’s position in the region. Sri Lanka and the Maldives have relatively quickly embraced a policy of strategic autonomy and diversification.

These smaller South Asian states have also learned to handle Chinese assertiveness and debt-trap diplomacy. The significant attention from the big powers has motivated them to pursue more active balancing and bargaining rather than becoming passive victims of structural competition. The smaller States have begun to reject or embrace Chinese investments based on their interests and welfare, providing them with more sustainable deals, aid, and grants.

This new regional order will be a long-term affair, as neither India nor China intends to back down from competing in and for South Asia. New Delhi and Beijing will keep providing more financial incentives and lending to smaller States, which will continue to play both countries against each other in the hope of finding more sustainable and beneficial investments. Ideally, this strategic competition will provide some escape from further debt-trap diplomacy and unsustainable borrowing.

(Harsh V. Pant is the Director of Research at the Observer Research Foundation (ORF) in New Delhi and a Professor of International Relations at King’s College, London. Aditya Gowdara Shivamurthy is a Research Assistant at the ORF in New Delhi. He holds a Master of Science in International Relations from the London School of Economics and Political Science)

- Foreign Policy


 


Add new comment