Take a stand in the stride towards unity: Minister | Daily News

Take a stand in the stride towards unity: Minister

The public’s role in preserving the peace

For as long as Sri Lanka has been an independent and sovereign nation, its people have been torn between two opposing political forces. This is the battle between the politics of unity and politics of division. To unite peoples across religious, ethnic, and geographical lines requires moral courage and national vision. Unfortunately, many who have aspired to take on leadership roles in politics, the clergy, and business, have far too often taken the shortcut of trying to gain or retain their power and influence by seeking to divide the nation.

Some groups such as the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) have tried to carve our country in two among ethnic and geographical lines. More recently, the radical Islamic cult of Zahran Hashim and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), sought to set the country on fire by igniting themselves, as well as hundreds of innocent civilians and communities. All Sri Lankans condemn this unspeakable brutality. Our country owes the victims of these attacks an incalculable debt. Their grief is eternal, and the United National Party (UNP) will stand with them until the end of time.

Sadly, these terrorists are not the only forces who have succumbed to the temptation to lead Sri Lankans by dividing them. In 1983, several national leaders were guilty of, at minimum, turning a blind eye to heinous persecution of innocent Tamil civilians who were made to pay the price for crimes committed by the LTTE. During the 1989 insurrection, extremists ruthlessly killed civilians of all faiths and ethnicities. The government’s crackdown on their brutality was so heinous that none other than Mahinda Rajapaksa went to Geneva to seek international intervention to protect the human rights of Sri Lankan citizens.

In recent years, Sri Lankans have made many strides towards a more unified country. For every step forward we take, the stark reality is that there will always be those whose political survival depends on dragging the country backward and trying to divide us along sectarian lines.

It cannot be said too many times that most Tamils had nothing to do with the LTTE, most Sinhalese did not support the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) insurrections, most Muslims abhor and denounce radicalisation of their religion, and most Catholics and Christians are disgusted by the attempts of a few to legitimise a racist and religiously-motivated witch-hunt.

At the forefront of this witch-hunt, attempting to hijack our criminal justice system with sectarian fairy tales about forced sterilisations and terrorists lurking under every kufi, are the same men of the cloth who, before 2015, led mobs to burn innocent shopkeepers alive. Standing in solidarity with this hatred are those who committed the cardinal sin of remaining silent while these same mobs attacked and set alight evangelical churches with the tacit blessing of the previous regime. These laymen and clergy do not represent the vast majority of followers of their faith, who want only to live together in peace and harmony.

But there is a clear and present danger in ethnic peace and harmony. It is not a danger to the country or to its people—but a danger to certain politicians, media institutions, political movements, and clergymen. In a united Sri Lanka, where Muslims don’t fear Buddhists, where Sinhalese don’t fear Tamils, and where Christians can worship in peace, they would become irrelevant.

When a political party, media organisation or religious leader depends for their survival on one group of Sri Lankans becoming afraid of another, we must be wary of them. When their survival depends on highlighting what divides us and undermining what unites us, we must be wary of them. What role is there for them in a Sri Lanka in which Sinhalese women were not afraid of lurking Muslim doctors waiting to sterilise them, and instead choose their doctor without regard to religion. What role is there for them in a Sri Lanka where a Christian need not be tempted to convert to Buddhism to succeed in politics? What role is there for them in a Sri Lanka where your religion or ethnicity does not play a role in your employment, housing or marriage prospects?

What these people do not want you to know is that in such a Sri Lanka, they would have no role. No one would vote for them and no one would worship them; no one would advertise with them and no one would listen to them. That is why they try to frighten us, that is why they try to divide us—that is why they relentlessly target anyone who would try to unite us. They don’t care what faith a person belongs to, or whom they support, as long as you are on their side.

Everyone should know how Rishad Bathiudeen earned the ire of the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) and its minions among the media and the clergy. When they tried to illegally overthrow the government last October 26, they pleaded with this very same so-called terrorist to join their government. They tried bribing him, they tried threatening him; but Bathiudeen refused to support an illegal government.

Mark my words, had he supported Mahinda Rajapaksa in Parliament last year, there would not have been a No-Confidence Motion against him. He would not be called a terrorist; there would be a new target. Even today, he is being cajoled to join the other side in exchange for the removal of his terrorist label. This is a man who served as a Cabinet Minister under them for almost a decade, who we are supposed to believe suddenly became a terrorist overnight after he stood by the UNP and by democracy?

The irony of the No-Confidence Motion being brought against this man is that it is being championed by parliamentarians who clung to power for a whole month after their illegal government last year was defeated in not one, not two, but three consecutive No-Confidence Motions. When they saw that they could not get their way, the whole country and the world watched as they attempted to terrorise Parliament on November 16, last year.

Every elected and appointed official in our country has sworn an oath to uphold and defend a Constitution that does not give power to politicians, priests or social media platforms to decide who is guilty or innocent of any crime, including terrorism. That is a sacred duty left to our judges after a police investigation and fair trial are conducted.

In a country with such a proud tradition of justice, where all citizens were once entitled to be considered innocent until proven guilty; people, including a Cabinet Minister; have been declared guilty without evidence, and the police have invited public complaints against these targetted four individuals in order to find them guilty of something—anything. Racists and xenophobes have hijacked our justice system and turned it upside down.

If Rishad Bathiudeen or anyone else has committed a crime, there is a process for a criminal investigation to commence, for evidence against them to be presented before courts, and for justice to take its course. If they are guilty, they should be punished. Especially in the current context, our police and security forces have unprecedented autonomy to investigate and prosecute anyone remotely connected to these attacks.

But never in the history of our country have people first been declared guilty by the press and in Parliament, only to thereafter have the police call for evidence that they may have committed a crime. Today, the targets are Muslim leaders being accused of terrorism. Who will tomorrow’s targets be? What will they be accused of? If this becomes the new norm, no one will be safe from this kind of mob lynching.

In a way, we must sympathise with those Sri Lankans on the street who have taken the bait fed to them by their political and religious leaders and are driven to violence by fear and a carefully-nurtured sense of hatred. Even those people who cursed my parents for my actions must be doing so because they have been programmed to be afraid of anyone who dared question the leaders of their tribe.

These leaders who bait and whip them into a frenzy do not deserve our sympathy. Whether they sit in Parliament, call themselves clergymen, print newspapers or use our airwaves, they know what they are doing when stirring up mobs against each other. Especially at a time when our marshals, generals, and admirals are appealing to us to keep the peace, it is devastating to see politicians, religious leaders, and media moguls trying to incite racial and religious hatred that could drive us into another war.

I have no doubt that my parents would be proud of me for standing on principle and fighting for a united Sri Lanka. As for those who are trying to set our country on fire, it is their children, and great-grandchildren, who will one day be forced to reckon with and disavow their dirty deeds. No lie can live forever, and someday, the whole country will see through their self-serving duplicity.

To the vast majority of Sri Lankans of all faiths, ethnicities, and political orientations, it is our turn to speak up before it is too late.

If you abhor terrorism, the act of using violence or the threat of violence to achieve a political objective, you must speak up. If you believe that evidence of a crime must be put before a judge by the police and prosecutors before someone can be pronounced guilty, you must speak up. If you want your children to grow up in harmony within a peaceful and united Sri Lanka, you must speak up. If you believe that extremism, whether radical Islamic extremism, radical anti-Islamic extremism, and other forms of racially-charged hatred have no place in our motherland, you must speak up.

Do not try to appease extremists or seek middle ground with them. They will make use of you and then move the goalposts further to the extreme. I have often criticised Prime Minister S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike for reneging on the Bandaranaike-Chelvanayagam pact and giving in to the extremists of his day. In the end, he did not go far enough to appease them and paid for it with his life.

Even with his abdomen shredded by bullets and with every reason to give in to hatred and vengeance, he found the courage and humanity to try and unite his country. In the truest sense of Buddhism, he appealed for his murderer to be shown compassion. “I appeal to the people of my country to be restrained and patient at this time,” said the dying Prime Minister. To those closest to him, he implored “to be calm and to face the present situation with courage and fortitude.”

I am a devout Buddhist, not because I say so, but because I believe deeply in the tenets of Buddhism and the teachings of the Buddha. I believe that when our Constitution calls upon our country to “give to Buddhism the foremost place” and to “foster the Buddha Sasana”, this means defending the values that the Buddha preached, such as compassion, tolerance, and peace.

At the very outset of the Dhammapada, we are told that “hatred is never appeased by hatred. By non-hatred alone is hatred appeased.” This week, Muslim ministers led by Rauff Hakim and Kabir Hashim gave life to this teaching of the Buddha by standing in solidarity with their colleague who became the target of hate. I applaud their bravery and stand in solidarity with them.

But I believe that as the guardians of Buddhism, all Sri Lankans—especially Buddhists—have an especial and sacred duty to stand up to those who seek to preach hatred, intolerance, and violence in the name of the Buddha.


 

Add new comment