Bandula challenges Foreign Exchange Bill in Supreme Court | Page 740 | Daily News

Bandula challenges Foreign Exchange Bill in Supreme Court


A Special Determination petition challenging the bill titled “Foreign Exchange, 2017" was filed before the Supreme Court by MP Bandula Gunawardena today.

The petition was filed by the MP, seeking a declaration that the bill shall become law only through a two-third majority in Parliament and the approval of the people at a referendum.

The petitioner stated that a bill titled “Foreign Exchange, 2017" was presented to the Parliament and placed on Order Paper of the Parliament on April 7, 2017. 

The  petitioner stated that  clauses 2(2), 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 32 of  the  bill  are  in  violation of and inconsistent with Articles  03,  04,  12(1), 14(1)(g), 75 and 148  of  the  Constitution.

The petitioner stated that clauses 2(2), 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22 and 24 of the Foreign Exchange Bill deprives and abrogates the power of Parliament to have full control over public finance as enshrined by Article 148 of the Constitution.

The petitioner further stated that the said bill further deprives and abrogates the powers and duties of the Central Bank and the Monetary Board to supervise, regulate and control matters in relation to foreign exchange including Gold, currency, payments, securities, debts and import, export, transfer and settlement of property as provided by the Exchange Control Act Mo.24 of 1953.

"The bill empowers the Minister and the cabinet of Ministers with the authority to be in charge of and thereby to regulate and control affairs and matters in relation to foreign exchange and all instructions authorised to act as dealers or otherwise dealing with foreign exchange," the petitioner added.

This special determination petition was filed through senior counsel Kanishka Vitharana and counsel H.M.Tillekaratne.


There is 1 Comment

He is good to be a tution master but not a politician or anythin to do with the country's economy. His knowledge is limited to what is taught at A levels, he has no doctorate or higher degree from any foreign recognised university, no foreign exposure at all. People like this should be confined to teach students because he is good at this teaching but does not have a broad vision for the country


Add new comment

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Or log in with...