|
Report to the Cabinet of Ministers by External
Affairs Minister:
Post conflict development in Sri Lanka
Visit of the
President and External Affairs Minister for the 66th session of the UN
General Assembly: September 19-25, 2011, New York
The President and the delegation attended the general debate of the
66th session of the UNGA, from September 19 to 25 in New York. This
General Assembly was the first session for the UN Secretary-General,
since his re-election to the high post for a second term. The Assembly
was presided over by the Permanent Representative in New York of the
State of Qatar.
The General Debate of the Session commenced on the morning of
September 21 having the overarching theme of ‘The role of mediation in
the settlement of disputes by peaceful means.’ The President addressed
the General Assembly on the morning of September 23, 2011.
|

External Affairs Minister Prof G. L. Peiris |
Bilateral discussions
It provided an opportunity to apprise the world community of the
development that had taken place within a short span of two-and half
years, since the end of the conflict, in resettlement, reconstruction
and rehabilitation activities. Also, the efforts by the government to
ensure livelihood support for the people, reinvigoration of the
democratic process through the holding of elections in the North and
East and the local reconciliation mechanism as well as the political
measures to redress issues of concern to all citizens. The key messages
conveyed therein were relevant to all member states and were well
received; especially those being threatened by terrorism. Further, there
was a call on the developing world to collectively insist on the
procedures of multilateral organizations being consistent and devoid of
discrimination.
The President also took this opportunity to reiterate the need to
have decisive action on the issue of Palestine. He also expressed
solidarity of Sri Lanka towards the Cuban people and underlined the need
for sustained support for countries of the African Continent.
The presence of many world leaders provided the benefit of holding
bilateral discussions on the fringes of the main event. These
discussions had added relevance, having learnt that moves were afoot by
Canada to have a procedural decision/resolution on Sri Lanka at the
current 18th Session of the Human Rights Council in Geneva, to formalize
an agenda item on holding an interactive dialogue on Sri Lanka,
especially on the LLRC report, at the 19th Session of the HRC Session
scheduled for March 2012. Our focus was to brief on this unprecedented
and procedurally flawed move, HRC member countries and those non-members
with influence.
Both the President and I met with the following member countries of
the Human Rights Council; President of Nigeria, the Emir of the State of
Qatar, Vice President of Uganda, President of Kyrgyz Republic (Bureau
member of the HRC) and the President of Senegal. I continued this effort
by having bilateral meetings with my counterparts of Indonesia, Uruguay
(President of the HRC), Cameroon and Angola.
UN Security Council
I also addressed individual letters while in New York to the 46
Foreign Ministers who are members of the HRC, explaining our position
regarding this proposed initiative. Many of the friends acknowledged the
danger in allowing action on a domestic process which is yet to see the
light of the day, as it sets negative and unsound precedent in the
conduct of business within the UN system. The response we received was
encouraging as they agreed that such selective and subjective action
could affect not only Sri Lanka but any country in the future.
The meetings with the President of Palestine and the President of
Iran were an opportunity to reiterate the personal rapport between the
leaders and the President as well as to exchange views of bilateral
importance. The meeting with the President of Colombia was important in
furthering our bilateral relations as well as to apprise on the current
post conflict development in Sri Lanka being a current member of the UN
Security Council and as a conduit to the Group of Latin American
countries. The President also met the President of Slovania, at their
request. All these interactions also helped to pursue furthering
stronger bilateral political and economic relations.
To be continued |