Child soldiers and human rights
Defence Affairs
Spokesman Minister Keheliya Rambukwella has found fault with
Human Rights Watch for it’s duplicitous conduct vis-a-vis the
Government and the LTTE.
Speaking at the weekly security briefing the Minister
referred to the army of child soldiers who were present at the
funeral of Thamilselvan in Kilinochchi and asked if HRW was
blind to this fact while it focused only on the death of the
LTTE political Commissar.
The Minister also blamed the media for not highlighting this
fact when the UN and European Union are expressing concern on
the issue of child soldiers.
We trust that Louis Arbour and those of her ilk who went to
town on alleged human rights violations by the Security Forces
would take note of this most damning evidence of the recruitment
of child soldiers by the LTTE.
Why only point an accusing finger at the Government on the
question of Human rights ? True, there will be those who will
argue that a legitimate Government cannot be equated with a
terrorist organisation and has to act within certain constraints
and abide by the various international charters and conventions
governing human rights.
It is very well known that many Human Rights groups
sympathise with the LTTE. If not they will be out of business.
Hence their partiality to the outfit while being quick to blame
the government.
However they cannot pretend to be blind to the ground
realities of a guerrilla war. The Minister’s lament is a
familiar echo of similar sentiments expressed by all Government
spokesmen during the three decades old conflict where the
accusing finger was always directed at the Government with the
LTTE atrocities ignored or downplayed by Human Rights groups.
The Government has always been on the firing line of these
groups who have been working to set agendas. If they genuinely
want to protect human rights they cannot be selective.
The LTTE had given a firm undertaking to UN Special
Rapporteur Olara Otunu to stop recruiting child soldiers and
during the peace talks undertook to rehabilitate the conscripts
and return them to their parents.
The picture at Thamilselvan’s funeral with children in combat
fatigues tells a different story. At least now will those who
lecture the Government on human rights take stock of the
situation and pay attention to the rampant infringement of human
rights that is going on behind the Wanni curtain?
Doctorates galore
Our centre page
article yesterday on the whole issue of awarding Doctorates in
this country would certainly have raised more than a few
eyebrows given the scandalous nature of the whole affair.
Doctorates in the past were hallowed endowments conferred
upon the highest attainments on the academic scale. They were
not to be trifled or handed out lightly. Only recognised
academic institutions could confer such titles and there were no
known instances where there was straying from this procedure.
Doctorates in the past were coveted titles earned through
years of toil and sacrifice, dint and perseverance and the
holders of these doctorates comprised the cream of the
intelligentsia in the country. They commanded high regard and
respect and usually were in great demand in the marriage market.
Doctorates in the past were conferred chiefly on academic
attainments. Honourary doctorates were rare and usually awarded
after lifetime achievements in specified fields such as
literary, arts and allied disciplines.
There have been many offers to confer doctorates on
politicians in the past and the only known politician who
carried the prefix of Doctor was Ananda Tissa De Alwis. (Even
though Ronnie De Mel too had a doctorate the media did not carry
the prefix).
There was a however a reticence on the part of politicians of
that era to the title. Two politicians that readily come to mind
in this connection are Sirimavo Bandaranaike and Ranasinghe
Premadasa. The latter refused the ‘doctor of letters’ title that
was offered to him by a well known academic institution.
Doctorates today have become as frequent as JPships that have
been conferred on all comers and have lost their value and
regard. The Government should study the full implications of
this indiscriminate awarding of doctorates by NGOs and other
institutions with dubious credentials before the country becomes
a laughing stock of the outside world.
A law should be introduced banning the awarding of doctorates
over the counter so to speak. Persons or institutions engaged in
the practice should be exposed and hounded out if not for
anything than the injustice and humiliation inflicted on the
genuine holders of the titles.
It is hoped that the given the antics of some politicians who
had been conferred such doctorates, there will be no more takers
for this once coveted title granted willy nilly by rouge
institutions and other imposters. |