Thursday, 20 May 2010

EMAIL |   PRINT | FEEDBACK

Sri Lanka Sports News | Online edition of Daily News - Lakehouse Newspapers <%dim dbpath, pageTle, Section, Section1 %>

Time to get rid of Interim Committees

We, as Sri Lankans, have enjoyed our democratic rights for over seven decades. As a nation, we have always valued democracy and most of our leaders, except for a couple in the past, have done their utmost best to protect and preserve democracy for the next generation.

As it is defined simply, democracy is for the people, from the people and by the people. It always honour and respect the wish of the majority.

That is precisely why we spent millions of rupees to conduct elections at various levels, be it presidential election, general elections, provincial council elections or local government elections. That enables masses to exercise their democratic rights and elect people of their choice to be their representatives at the Parliament, Provincial Councils, Municipal Councils, Town Councils or Pradheshiya Sabhas.

But do we experience the same five-star democracy when it comes to sports arena? If so, there can’t be so many interim councils which have almost become permanent in some sports.

According to the National Sports Law, Executive Committees of each National Sports Association (NSA) should be elected at an annual general meeting (NSA) annually, on or before March 31 each year. President, the other top office bearers of each NSA are elected by member clubs, associations and affiliated bodies of the respective national controlling body.

Minister if Sports, under the provisions vested in him by the National Sports Law, could dissolve any elected Ex-co of NSA if he finds any mismanagement, irregular conduct or frauds.

He could then appoint an interim administration of his choice until the Sports Ministry conducts an investigation against the sacked executive committee.

If he finds the ex-co guilty, he could instruct the Director General of Sports to conduct fresh elections under his supervision. If the ex-co in question is cleared of all charges, the Sports Minister has the power to reinstate the existing Ex-co without fresh elections.

Unfortunately, some of the Interim Committees appointed by previous Sports Ministers are still functioning, completely ignoring the democratic rights of member clubs, associations and affiliated bodies of those NSAs.

The word ‘interim’ itself gives a clear indication that such committees appointed are temporary and would only function until the investigations on allegations made against an ex-co are over. In other words, these Ministry-appointed interim committees are temporary, provisional, acting or short-term.

Surprisingly, most of these interim committees appointed by successive Sports Ministers have now become permanent, completely ignoring the democratic rights of member clubs, associations and affiliated bodies of a NSA. More interestingly, some interim councils have been functioning for years and years, even a decade!

You may wonder as to why we caw so much about interim councils. That is purely because of accountability of officials.

When there is a democratically elected set of office bearers, they are accountable for their general membership for whatever the decisions they make. Even if a member club or association finds an irregularity or inappropriate decision of an ex-co, they have the right to question. That is purely because of the fact that it’s the general membership which appoints the executive committee members.

But this is not the case when it comes to interim administration. The interim Committees are appointed by the Sports Minister. Hence, they are only answerable to the Sports Minister and not to the general membership of that particular NSA. Whatever the controversial decisions taken by the members of an interim committee could not be questioned by member clubs and associations.

Now that the new Minister of Sports C.B. Ratnayake has just assumed duties, we thought of focusing his attention on the need to re-establish democracy in the field of sports.

The Government has done its utmost best to protect democracy and strongly believes the power of people. Minister Ratnayake is no exception.

The Government was able to restore democratic rights of the people in the North and East after 30 long years. For the first time in 30 years, the Government was able to conduct a presidential election in the entire country, including all parts of the Northern and the Eastern Provinces. There is no better time than this to restore democracy for the member clubs and associations whose voices have been conveniently silenced by interim administrations.

Hence, we earnestly hope Minister Ratnayake will make the first move towards re-establishing democracy by replacing the current interim councils with democratically elected executive committees. He could do so step by step, identifying the most notorious interim administrations first - such as the ‘educated’ man who spent nearly eight lakhs to fund the general election campaign of a politician whom he thought would become the Sports Minister.

As we have stated here before, Minister Ratnayake has a clean and a proven track record as a politician. He has the ability to clean Sri Lanka sports once and forever!

As far as rugby is concerned, it appears as if the member clubs and associations of the Sri Lanka Rugby Football Union (SLRFU) keen to retain the current interim council, led by Dr. Maiya Gunasekera. Contrary to most interim chiefs, Dr. Gunasekera is eager to quit and hand over the interim administration to a democratically elected set of office bearers.

Unfortunately, there had not been a quorum to conduct an AGM on both occasions they attempted to conduct fresh elections to the SLRFU. We hope the SLRFU would be able to sort out this ‘quorum problem’ soon and elect a new council. If we fail to do so, the world governing body the IRB, may well suspend the SLRFU, depriving our ruggerites an opportunity of competing at international matches and tournaments.

Whatever is said and done, the Sports Minister must act fearlessly and get rid of all interim councils, however ‘good’ they may be! We have nothing personal against any of the existing interim committees but stated all these facts in the best interest of sport.

 

Produced by Lake House Copyright © 2006 - 2013 The Associated Newspapers of Ceylon Ltd.

Comments and suggestions to : Web Editor